When one of these noneconomic categories is threatened and,if we happen to love it .we invert excuses to give it economic importance.at the beginning of century songbiras were supposed to be disappearing.(46scinentists jumped to the resure with some distimctly shaky evidence to the effect that insects would eat us up of birds failed to control them),the evideuce had to be conbmic in order to be valid.
It is pamful to read these round about accounts today .we have no land ethic yet ,(47but we have at least drawn near the point of admitting that birds should continue as a matter of intrinsic right,regardless of the presence or absence of economic advantage to us)
A panallel situation exists in respect of predatory mamals and fish-eating birds .(48time was when biologists somewhat over worded the evidence that these creatures preserve the health of game by killing the physically weak,or that they prey only on “worthless species)
Some species of tree have been read out of the party by economics-minded foresters because they grow too slowly .or have too low a sale vale to pay as imeber crops (49in europe ,where forestry is ecologically more advanced ,the ncommercial tree species are recognized ad members of native forest community ,to be preserved as such ,within reason)
To sum up:a system of conservation based solely on economic self-interest is hopelessly lopsided.(50It tends to ignore, and thus eventually to eliminate, many elements in the land community that lack commercial value, but that are essential to its healthy functioning.)without the uneconomic pats.
|考试吧 环球职教 三美世纪 广发银行 中信银行 河南商报 清华同方 知识在线 中国留学网 中国俊才网 中原图书大厦 中国招聘联盟 小主人成功网|
|清华继续教育学院 新锐娱乐学习门户 中国高等教育学生信息网 中国医疗卫生人才网|
|中青在线 赛迪网校 朗曼 1+1 伤雨天堂 齐鲁教育网 企业大学网 河北教育网 网站推广助手 新浪教育频道 搜狐教育频道 中华会计网校|